Welcome to Top of the Morning by Mint, your weekday newscast that brings you five major stories from the world of business. It's Wednesday, December 11, 2024. This is Nelson John, let's get started.
Lenovo has been quite adept at navigating the business landscape in India, avoiding the regulatory scrutiny faced by Chinese companies in India. But how? A big part of its strategy was to jump into local manufacturing in 2005, well before many others. This early start not only helped it build a solid trust base but also positioned it as a committed player in India’s economic scene, not just another overseas company trying to tap into a lucrative market. Lenovo’s approach to being a global brand rather than just a Chinese one has also played well for it. It has been very careful about compliance and made it a point to pay taxes diligently, which clearly sets it apart in a market where scrutiny around Chinese investments has intensified. Gulveen Aulakh takes a detailed look at the Chinese tech giant’s strategy for survival in the Indian market.
The longstanding friction between Shapoorji Pallonji Group and Tata Trusts continues, even after the passing of Ratan Tata. SP Group, holding an 18.4% stake in Tata Sons, aims to renegotiate its loans by using these shares as collateral to attract new investors—a move not sanctioned by Tata Trusts. Tata Sons, having transitioned to a private company in 2017, restricts share transfers without approval, a condition reinforced by the company’s Articles of Association. In a mail to Mint’s Varun Sood, Siddharth Sharma, CEO of Tata Trusts, emphasized that Tata Sons shares should not be used as collateral, highlighting the restrictive nature of share transfers after the company's privatization. This stance is supported unanimously by Tata Trusts' executive committee, indicating a continuation of the group's traditional governance approach even under the new chairmanship of Noel Tata.
The long-standing financial dispute involving the National Spot Exchange Ltd (NSEL) and its investors has taken a new turn. The NSEL Investor Action Group (NIAG) recently withdrew their support for a proposed one-time settlement (OTS) with 63 Moons Technologies Ltd, complicating the decade-long effort to recover investors’ dues owed to investors since NSEL's collapse in 2013. Neha Joshi reports that the decision came after 63 Moons attempted to access ₹300 crore from assets that were previously attached, ostensibly for operational expenses, without a prior consultation with the NIAG. This move was perceived by the NIAG as a breach of the foundational agreements of the settlement talks, prompting them to withdraw their endorsement for the settlement offer, which initially aimed to distribute ₹1,950 crore to investors—about 42% of the total ₹4,650 crore claimed by investors. However, the NSEL Investors Forum (NIF) has claimed that it has secured the support of investors, having approximately 64.5% in value of the outstanding claims, and it is confident that it will secure the majority consent for the settlement.
HMD's new 'Fusion' smartphone is stirring curiosity with its promise of modularity, primarily focusing on easy swaps for its display and back panel. Unlike fully modular phones that allow changes to core performance elements, the Fusion offers customizable back panels with specific functionalities, like an LED light ring for creators and a gaming controller, Shouvik Das explains. This level of modularity is moderate but intriguing, especially as the global regulatory environment shifts towards stronger right-to-repair laws. Modular phones have been around in various forms, like Google's ambitious but ultimately shelved Project Ara, and others like LG's G5 and Motorola's Z2, which incorporated modular aspects to enhance flexibility and potentially extend the device's lifespan. However, these products generally didn't achieve mass-market success due to high costs, limited third-party accessory support, and an overall market preference for more integrated, seamless smartphone experiences.
As celebrities increasingly face the brunt of defamatory content circulated by trolls, they are turning more toward legal measures to protect their image. High-profile figures like AR Rahman, Salman Khan, and Akshay Kumar have recently threatened or initiated defamation suits against media platforms that host damaging content about them. This trend highlights a growing concern among celebrities about the unregulated nature of social media, where unchecked dissemination of content can rapidly tarnish reputations, Lata Jha reports. Legal experts point out that celebrities are especially vulnerable to defamation due to public curiosity about their personal lives. Platforms like social media amplify these issues by allowing rapid spread of unverified information, often without the traditional checks of editorial oversight. This has led to a rise in legal actions by celebrities not just in India but globally, reflecting a proactive stance against damaging allegations.
Weitere Episoden von „Top of the Morning“
Verpasse keine Episode von “Top of the Morning” und abonniere ihn in der kostenlosen GetPodcast App.