The Epstein Rewind: Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein And The Musician

On this morning's edition of the show, we take a look at the headlines from overnight and talk a little bit more about Maxwell and Epstein's propensity to search out the most vulnerable amongst us for their abuse.(commercial at 13:52)To contact me:[email protected]:https://www.ft.com/content/0b9d93da-1687-4eb1-bd53-0a84a1b40dff

In a move that is disappointing but that shouldn't be shocking, the UK government has announced that it is putting it's files on Prince Andrew behind lock and key for 65 years. That's an extra 40 years more than the usual. Considering the way the investigation has went in the UK in regard to Jeffrey Epstein, it should not come as a shock. The files will not be released until Prince Andrew is 105 years old. (commercial at 8:01)to contact me:[email protected]:Prince Andrew files locked away until 2065 as royal biographer slams 'culture of secrecy' | Royal | News | Express.co.uk

As we predicted on the podcast, JP Morgan and the survivor of Jeffrey Epstein who brought the suit against the banking giant have now settled for an undetermined amount of money. The settlement effectively ends the lawsuit against JP Morgan. JP morgan and their lawsuit against Jes Staley is still active and the lawsuit brought by the USVI against JP Morgan and Jes Staley also remain in the system.(commercial at 8:10)to contact me:[email protected]:JPMorgan agrees to settle Jeffrey Epstein victim class action lawsuit | Fox Business

Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell had many ways to intimidate their victims. One of the major ways they were able to keep control, however, was the dossiers that were compiled on their victims. In this episode, we hear more about the malicious scheme.(commercial at 15:51)to contact me:[email protected]:https://www.thedailybeast.com/epstein-kept-dossiers-on-his-victims-to-blackmail-them

In a significant development, Jane Doe, who previously accused Jay-Z of raping her at a 2000 MTV Video Music Awards after-party, was recorded admitting that the rapper did not assault her. In the recording, obtained by ABC News, she stated that while Jay-Z was present at the event, he "didn't have anything to do with any sexual acts" involving her. Furthermore, she alleged that her attorney, Tony Buzbee, "pushed" her to include Jay-Z in the lawsuit, suggesting that Buzbee encouraged her to pursue legal action against the rapper.In response, Buzbee denied these allegations, calling them a "blatant lie." He provided a separate recording where Jane Doe refuted claims that she had admitted to lying about Jay-Z's involvement or that Buzbee had coerced her into making false allegations. Despite these conflicting accounts, the lawsuit against Jay-Z and Sean "Diddy" Combs was dismissed with prejudice, meaning it cannot be refiled. Subsequently, Jay-Z filed a defamation lawsuit against Jane Doe and her attorneys, asserting that the false accusations have caused him significant personal and financial harm.to contact me:[email protected]:Jay-Z Accuser Admits He Never Raped Her and Blames Lawsuit On Lawyer

​In the ongoing case against Bryan Kohberger, accused of murdering four University of Idaho students in 2022, recent court filings reveal that his defense team plans to argue that the knife sheath found at the crime scene, which contained Kohberger's DNA, may have been planted by the actual perpetrator. Prosecutors have indicated that the defense does not dispute the presence of Kohberger's DNA on the sheath but contends that this evidence does not confirm his presence at the crime scene. Instead, they suggest that the real killer could have deliberately placed the sheath to mislead investigators.to contact me:[email protected]:Kohberger defense team plans to argue knife sheath planted by 'real killer' | Fox News

​Former Barclays CEO Jes Staley has admitted to having a consensual sexual encounter with a member of Jeffrey Epstein's staff at a New York apartment owned by Epstein's brother. This revelation emerged during Staley's testimony in his appeal against the Financial Conduct Authority's (FCA) proposed lifetime ban and £1.8 million fine for allegedly misleading the regulator about his relationship with Epstein. Staley maintains that, despite this incident, his relationship with Epstein was primarily professional, and he was unaware of Epstein's criminal activitiesJes Staley’s admission that he slept with one of Jeffrey Epstein’s staff is yet another damning piece of evidence exposing his deep entanglement with the disgraced financier. For years, Staley downplayed his relationship with Epstein, insisting it was purely professional. Now, as he faces a lifetime ban from the financial industry, his story is unraveling. His claim that he was unaware of Epstein’s crimes is absurd—Epstein’s 2008 conviction for sex trafficking should have been enough for any legitimate banker to sever ties. Instead, Staley maintained a cozy, almost servile relationship, exchanging over 1,000 emails with Epstein and even referring to him as “Uncle Jeffrey” in a message to his daughter. This wasn’t just a working relationship; it was an alliance, one that helped Epstein continue operating within elite financial circles while he was actively abusing young girls.Staley’s excuse that this sexual encounter was “consensual” is equally disgusting, considering Epstein’s well-documented pattern of coercion and trafficking. The idea that any of the women under Epstein’s control had true agency is laughable—Epstein hand-picked vulnerable girls, manipulated them, and created an environment where they had no real choice. Whether Staley knew the full extent of Epstein’s crimes or not, he willingly participated in the toxic, exploitative ecosystem that Epstein cultivated. His desperate attempts to downplay, deny, and distance himself now only serve to highlight his own moral bankruptcy. If he had any integrity, he would have spoken up years ago. Instead, he’s in court, feigning ignorance, hoping to escape punishment while his legacy crumbles under the weight of his own lies.to contact me:[email protected]:Ex-Barclays boss Jes Staley admits having sex with Jeffrey Epstein's employee in New York building where paedophile trafficked underage girls | Daily Mail Online

​In Case No. CR01-24-31665, the State responded to the Defendant's Motion in Limine #11, which sought to exclude evidence related to Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG). The Defendant indicated an intention to exclude IGG evidence and not to call expert witnesses on the matter. In light of this, the State agreed not to introduce IGG evidence or related expert testimony. Instead, the State proposed to present that law enforcement received a "tip," without specifying its source or content, which led to the identification of the Defendant. ​This approach aims to streamline the trial by focusing on direct evidence linking the Defendant to the crime, while avoiding potential complexities and disputes surrounding the IGG process. By mutually agreeing to exclude IGG evidence, both parties seek to prevent unnecessary confusion or prejudice that could arise from discussing the investigative techniques used during the investigation.to contact me:[email protected]:031025+States+Response+Defendants+Motion+in+Limine+Re+Exclude+IGG+Evidence.pdf

​In Case No. CR01-24-31665, the State responded to the Defendant's Motion in Limine #11, which sought to exclude evidence related to Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG). The Defendant indicated an intention to exclude IGG evidence and not to call expert witnesses on the matter. In light of this, the State agreed not to introduce IGG evidence or related expert testimony. Instead, the State proposed to present that law enforcement received a "tip," without specifying its source or content, which led to the identification of the Defendant. ​This approach aims to streamline the trial by focusing on direct evidence linking the Defendant to the crime, while avoiding potential complexities and disputes surrounding the IGG process. By mutually agreeing to exclude IGG evidence, both parties seek to prevent unnecessary confusion or prejudice that could arise from discussing the investigative techniques used during the investigation.to contact me:[email protected]:031025+States+Response+Defendants+Motion+in+Limine+Re+Exclude+IGG+Evidence.pdf

Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán is one of the most notorious drug lords in history, known for his leadership of the Sinaloa Cartel, one of the most powerful drug trafficking organizations in the world. Here's a comprehensive summary of his arrest, extradition, and trial in the United States:Arrests:February 1993: El Chapo was first arrested in Guatemala and extradited to Mexico, where he faced charges related to drug trafficking. He was later transferred to a maximum-security prison in Mexico.January 2001: He managed to escape from the prison with the help of bribed prison guards, hiding in a laundry cart. Following his escape, he continued to lead the Sinaloa Cartel and expand its operations.February 2014: Mexican authorities captured El Chapo in Mazatlán, Mexico, after years of pursuit. This capture was a result of a joint operation by Mexican and U.S. law enforcement agencies.Extradition:January 2016: Guzmán was extradited to the United States to face charges related to drug trafficking, money laundering, and other criminal activities. His extradition came after a lengthy legal battle and diplomatic negotiations between the U.S. and Mexico.January 2017: El Chapo was arraigned in a federal court in Brooklyn, New York, where he pleaded not guilty to a 17-count indictment.Trial:November 2018: The trial against El Chapo began in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The trial garnered significant media attention due to the high-profile nature of the case and the sensational details of Guzmán's alleged crimes.February 2019: After a three-month trial featuring testimonies from over 50 witnesses, including former associates and law enforcement officials, El Chapo was found guilty on all counts, including engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise, drug trafficking, and firearms offenses.July 2019: Guzmán was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole, plus an additional 30 years, and ordered to forfeit $12.6 billion. The sentence was handed down by Judge Brian Cogan in a federal court in Brooklyn, New York.Life in Prison: El Chapo is currently serving his sentence at the United States Penitentiary Administrative Maximum Facility (ADX) in Florence, Colorado, often referred to as the "Supermax" prison, known for its strict conditions and high-security measures.El Chapo's arrest, extradition, and trial marked a significant victory for law enforcement agencies in their efforts to combat international drug trafficking and organized crime.(commercial at 8:13)to contact me:[email protected]:chapo-us-resp.pdf (courthousenews.com)