Gone But Not Forgotten Compilation: Rachel Cooke And Lauren Spierer (1/17/25)

In State v. Bryan C. Kohberger, Case No. CR01-24-31665, Judge Steven Hippler issued a Memorandum Decision and Order addressing multiple defense motions aimed at removing the death penalty as a sentencing option. The defense presented 12 motions challenging various aspects of Idaho's capital punishment framework, including the constitutionality of execution methods and the applicability of certain aggravating factors. After thorough consideration, Judge Hippler denied all motions, affirming that the death penalty remains a viable sentencing option in this case.The court's 55-page decision systematically addressed each defense argument, referencing precedents set by the Idaho Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court that uphold the constitutionality of capital punishment. Judge Hippler concluded that the defense's claims did not warrant the removal of the death penalty, allowing the prosecution to continue seeking it as a potential sentence. This ruling signifies a pivotal moment in the proceedings, underscoring the court's commitment to adhering to established legal standards in capital cases. to contact me:[email protected]:112024-Memorandum-Decision-Order-Death-Penalty-Motions.pdf

In McKinney v. Combs et al., Case No. 24-CV-03931, defendants Sean Combs, along with several associated entities including Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, Sean John Clothing LLC, and Daddy’s House Recordings, Inc., submitted a letter to Judge Buchwald outlining their motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s Amended Complaint. The defendants argue that the claims lack substantive legal merit and that procedural deficiencies render the case unsustainable. Representing both Sean Combs and the corporate defendants, they emphasize the insufficiency of the allegations and seek dismissal based on the failure to establish a valid cause of action under applicable laws. The filing complies with the court’s procedural requirements and aims to streamline resolution.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.621909.40.0.pdf

In the recent Peacock documentary "Diddy: The Making of a Bad Boy," serious allegations have been made against Sean "Diddy" Combs by individuals from his inner circle. One such claim involves a former musician who recounted a heated dispute during which Combs allegedly threatened to "eat" her flesh, highlighting a pattern of intimidation and bizarre behavior. Additionally, former associates have accused Combs of hosting "red light" sex parties involving underage girls, suggesting a history of sexual misconduct and exploitation. These revelations contribute to the growing list of accusations against Combs, who is currently facing multiple lawsuits alleging sexual assault and sex trafficking, all of which he has denied.In a recent development, DeVanté Swing, a member of the R&B group Jodeci, has been dismissed without prejudice from a sexual assault lawsuit filed by Liza Gardner against Sean "Diddy" Combs. Gardner had alleged that Swing, whose real name is Donald DeGrate, was complicit in the assault that occurred when she was 16 years old. The dismissal without prejudice allows for the possibility of future legal action against Swing, though no specific reasons for this decision have been publicly disclosed.(commercial at 8:26)to contact me:[email protected]:'Making the Band' alum accuses Diddy of 'inappropriate' touchingJodeci Member DeVante Swing Dismissed From Diddy Assault Lawsuit

Jeffrey Epstein's estate recently received a substantial $112 million tax refund, increasing its value to approximately $145 million. This development has sparked significant controversy, particularly because the estate had previously paid out $164 million to nearly 200 victims of Epstein's sexual abuse, as well as $105 million to the Virgin Islands government to settle claims related to his criminal activities. Critics argue that the tax refund could financially benefit individuals closely associated with Epstein, such as co-executors Darren Indyke and Richard Khan, who have been accused of aiding his illicit operations. The potential for these associates to receive payouts, while victims' compensations have been capped, has been labeled "morally objectionable" by some of Epstein's survivors.The situation underscores systemic issues within financial and legal frameworks that may inadvertently allow individuals connected to criminal activities to profit, even after substantial settlements have been made to victims. The lack of transparency regarding the beneficiaries of Epstein's 1953 Trust further exacerbates concerns about the equitable distribution of his remaining assets. This scenario highlights the need for more stringent oversight and reform to prevent the re-victimization of survivors and to ensure that justice is served in both legal and financial contexts.to contact me:[email protected]:Jeffrey Epstein’s Associates Could Reap Benefit of a Big Tax Refund - The New York Times

Rachel Cooke, a 19-year-old college student from Georgetown, Texas, disappeared without a trace on January 10, 2002, during a routine jog near her family’s home. Despite extensive searches, media attention, and ongoing investigations, no significant leads or evidence emerged. Over the years, several suspects and theories were considered, but each ultimately led to dead ends, leaving her case unsolved. In 2022, on the 20th anniversary of her disappearance, law enforcement reopened the investigation, utilizing advanced forensic technologies in hopes of uncovering new clues. While the case remains a mystery, her family continues to seek answers, holding on to the hope that modern science may finally bring closure to one of Texas’s most haunting missing person cases.Lauren Spierer, a 20-year-old Indiana University student, disappeared on June 3, 2011, after a night out in Bloomington, Indiana. Seen last around 4:30 AM, barefoot and disoriented, Lauren vanished without a trace, sparking a massive investigation. Despite extensive searches and media attention, no significant leads or evidence have emerged. Theories range from accidental death to foul play, including suspicions surrounding the friends she was with that night and the possibility of abduction. More than a decade later, her case remains unsolved, leaving her family and investigators desperate for answers while the mystery of her disappearance haunts Bloomington.(commercial at 8:29)to contact me:[email protected]

Andrew Gosden, a 14-year-old boy from Doncaster, England, vanished on September 14, 2007, after leaving home, withdrawing money, and purchasing a one-way train ticket to London. Despite extensive investigations, searches, and public appeals, no concrete evidence has emerged regarding his whereabouts or the reasons behind his disappearance. Multiple theories have been proposed, ranging from voluntary departure and mental health issues to abduction and foul play, but none have been confirmed. Advances in technology and renewed efforts by law enforcement continue to keep the case active, yet Andrew’s fate remains unknown, leaving his family and the public with unanswered questions and a lingering hope for resolution.In June 1970, 11-year-old Boy Scout Terrence "Terry" Bowers Jr. was brutally murdered while sleeping during a camping trip with Troop 94 at Brandywine Creek State Park, Pennsylvania. His body, found the next morning, had been stabbed multiple times, and despite an exhaustive investigation, the case quickly grew cold. Investigators gathered limited forensic evidence, but the murder weapon was never found, and no witnesses or suspects emerged. Over the decades, theories ranged from the killer being someone familiar with the camp to a random transient, but none have been substantiated. Despite modern advancements in forensic technology, the case remains unsolved, and Terry’s family continues to hope for justice.(commercial at 7:25)to contact me:  [email protected]

Jeffrey Epstein, the disgraced financier and convicted sex offender, possessed multiple passports, including a fraudulent Austrian passport discovered in his Manhattan mansion. This passport, bearing Epstein's photograph but a different name, listed a Saudi Arabian residence and contained stamps indicating travel to countries such as France, Spain, the United Kingdom, and Saudi Arabia during the 1980s. Epstein's attorneys claimed the passport was for personal protection due to his Jewish heritage, suggesting it was intended to prevent potential targeting during international travel.Additionally, records obtained by ABC News reveal that Epstein frequently applied for multiple U.S. passports, citing the need to obtain multiple visas simultaneously for his international business trips. In a 2011 letter to the U.S. Department of State, Epstein requested a second passport to facilitate upcoming travels to France and several African nations, including Sierra Leone, Mali, and Gabon. This request came three years after his guilty plea in Florida for solicitation of an underage girl, which required him to register as a sex offender for life.to contact me:[email protected]

Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students.The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger.Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary.The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter.In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court.(commercial at 8:05)to contact me:[email protected]:072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf

Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students.The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger.Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary.The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter.In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court.(commercial at 8:05)to contact me:[email protected]:072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf

Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students.The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger.Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary.The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter.In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court.(commercial at 8:05)to contact me:[email protected]:072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf