Moscow Murder Rewind: Judge Judge And The 37 Day Stay Order

One of the key pieces of evidence that the authorities offered in the PCA was the cell phone records of Bryan Kohberger. Using this data, investigators say that they were able to recreate Bryan Kohberger's movements on the morning in question by using the pings his cellphone made from the towers it connected to. How strong is that evidence though?In this episode, we hear from Ben Levitan, a telecommunications expert, who says that while the technology is helpful to build a case, it's not the kind of evidence that will convince a jury.(commercial at 6:41)to contact me:[email protected]:Expert: Cell records can’t pinpoint someone’s exact location | Idaho Statesman

According to a source who is familiar with the investigation, Bryan Kohberger was stalking his victim(s) for weeks before the actual murders. He also was very, very careful about leaving traces of his DNA whenever he was out in public in Pennsylvania, even going so far as to wear gloves while going out to cover his tracks. The source also says that Kohberger is not stupid and has taken steps to cover his tracks.Let's check it out!(commercial at 6:38)to contact me:[email protected]:Idaho suspect stalked victims for WEEKS and wore GLOVES | Daily Mail Online

As more news trickles out about Bryan Kohberger and his arrest we are now learning that when the search warrant for Bryan Kohberger's apartment was executed, they tested numerous items for blood. According to the newly released documents, multiple spots came back as hits.In this episode, we discuss what that could mean and how that could help or hurt Bryan Kohberger moving forward.(commercial at 7:47)to contact me:[email protected]:Blood found on items seized at Moscow homicide suspect’s apartment, records show | Nation/World | gazettextra.com

In this episode, we get right back to the court documents and this time we are taking a look at the 37 day stay ordered by Judge John Judge and several other new filings.(commercial at 8:00)to contact me:[email protected]:070723 Order Staying Time for Speedy Trial.pdf (idaho.gov)source:070623 Amended Stipulation for Prepartion and Release of Transcript and Record of Grand Jury Proceedings Wi.pdf (idaho.gov)source:070723 Order for County to Pay Expense of Transcribing Grand Jury Transcript.pdf (idaho.gov)

In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (Case No. 1:24-cr-00542-AS), the defense has filed a memorandum supporting a motion to suppress evidence obtained through search warrants executed at Combs' residences in Los Angeles and Miami. The defense contends that federal authorities included false statements and omitted critical exculpatory information in their affidavits to secure these warrants, particularly regarding the voluntary nature of an alleged victim's participation in events described by the prosecution. Additionally, the defense argues that the warrants were overly broad, leading to the seizure of extensive personal data and records beyond the scope of the investigation. In the alternative, the defense requests a Franks hearing to examine the veracity of the affidavits supporting the search warrants.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.160.0.pdf

In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (Case No. 1:24-cr-00542-AS), the defense has filed a memorandum supporting a motion to suppress evidence obtained through search warrants executed at Combs' residences in Los Angeles and Miami. The defense contends that federal authorities included false statements and omitted critical exculpatory information in their affidavits to secure these warrants, particularly regarding the voluntary nature of an alleged victim's participation in events described by the prosecution. Additionally, the defense argues that the warrants were overly broad, leading to the seizure of extensive personal data and records beyond the scope of the investigation. In the alternative, the defense requests a Franks hearing to examine the veracity of the affidavits supporting the search warrants.to contact me:[email protected]:gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.160.0.pdf

The growing outrage over the delayed release of the Epstein files has reached a boiling point, with critics accusing authorities of deliberately stalling transparency in one of the most high-profile sex trafficking cases in modern history. The public was promised the full unsealing of documents that would expose key associates, enablers, and potentially high-profile figures tied to Jeffrey Epstein’s criminal enterprise, yet months have passed with no significant updates. Many see this as another example of a two-tiered justice system, where the wealthy and powerful are shielded from scrutiny while the public is left in the dark. The delay has only fueled suspicions that critical information is being withheld to protect influential individuals, further eroding trust in institutions tasked with upholding the law.ocial media platforms, independent journalists, and advocacy groups have amplified calls for accountability, demanding to know why the files remain sealed despite previous commitments to release them. Hashtags like #EpsteinFiles and #ReleaseTheList continue to trend, with mounting frustration directed at both the justice system and mainstream media for their perceived lack of urgency in pursuing the full truth. The secrecy surrounding these documents only deepens concerns that the legal system is working to bury damning evidence rather than expose those complicit in Epstein’s trafficking network. Without full disclosure, many fear justice will remain elusive, and the powerful figures linked to Epstein will continue to evade consequences.to contact me:[email protected]:GOPers press for release of JFK, Epstein files: Here’s why they’re not out yet | Fox NewsFor those of you who would like to support my work you can do so here:https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support

Attorney Tony Buzbee, known for representing over 100 alleged victims in sexual assault lawsuits against Sean "Diddy" Combs, has encountered a significant legal hurdle. The Committee on Grievances for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) recently denied his application for admission to practice in the district, citing his failure to seek proper admission before appearing in cases within its jurisdiction. This decision restricts Buzbee from litigating in the SDNY, which encompasses key areas including New York City's five boroughs.In response, Buzbee has indicated plans to seek "pro hac vice" admission, a legal provision allowing attorneys not licensed in a specific jurisdiction to practice temporarily for particular cases, contingent upon court approval. This process requires him to attach the denial order to each request for admission moving forward. Despite this setback, Buzbee maintains that he is licensed to practice law in New York State and remains committed to his ongoing cases.(commercial at 8:19)to contact me:[email protected]:Tony Buzbee, attorney for sexual assault suits against Jay-Z and Diddy, hit with minor roadblock

In Ada County Case No. CR01-24-31665, the defendant, Bryan C. Kohberger, filed a motion requesting a Franks hearing, aiming to challenge the validity of the search warrant affidavits by alleging intentional or reckless false statements or omissions by law enforcement. After thorough consideration, the court denied this motion on February 19, 2025, concluding that the defendant did not meet the necessary burden to warrant such a hearing. Specifically, the court found insufficient evidence to suggest that any false statements or omissions were made intentionally or with reckless disregard for the truth in the affidavits supporting the search warrants.Additionally, the defense had submitted multiple motions to suppress evidence obtained through various search warrants, including those related to AT&T, Google, USB, Apple, Amazon, arrest warrants, and searches conducted in Pennsylvania and Idaho. These motions were also denied by the court. In its ruling, the court determined that the search warrants in question were supported by probable cause and that the evidence obtained was lawfully acquired. Consequently, all challenged evidence remains admissible in the ongoing proceedings against Mr. Kohberger.to contact me:[email protected]:021925-Order-Defedants-Moton-Franks-Hearing.pdf

In Ada County Case No. CR01-24-31665, the defendant, Bryan C. Kohberger, filed a motion requesting a Franks hearing, aiming to challenge the validity of the search warrant affidavits by alleging intentional or reckless false statements or omissions by law enforcement. After thorough consideration, the court denied this motion on February 19, 2025, concluding that the defendant did not meet the necessary burden to warrant such a hearing. Specifically, the court found insufficient evidence to suggest that any false statements or omissions were made intentionally or with reckless disregard for the truth in the affidavits supporting the search warrants.Additionally, the defense had submitted multiple motions to suppress evidence obtained through various search warrants, including those related to AT&T, Google, USB, Apple, Amazon, arrest warrants, and searches conducted in Pennsylvania and Idaho. These motions were also denied by the court. In its ruling, the court determined that the search warrants in question were supported by probable cause and that the evidence obtained was lawfully acquired. Consequently, all challenged evidence remains admissible in the ongoing proceedings against Mr. Kohberger.to contact me:[email protected]:021925-Order-Defedants-Moton-Franks-Hearing.pdf